A relevant text box was “Favourite item of clothing.” Many of the men in my sample did not complete this at all, and women were not particularly descriptive: “at the moment, my skinny jeans” (note the reference to body size); “bather”; “thigh-high boots”; and—more explicitly—“my really amazing black lace bra.” In spite of their brevity, these answers still seem to signify that site users are presenting their bodies in specific, gendered ways: the revelation that one wears women’s underwear is a choice that would no doubt seem out of place (to many heterosexual women) on a man’s profile. Pragmatics, rather than choice of object, could also reflect gendered differences—such as one interesting example in which two users (one male, one female) chose the same “favourite” item, shoes. While M8-27 picked “A good pair of shoes. Gotta have good shoes,” F9-30 showed more enthusiasm with “Shoes, shoes, shoes!” The “male” version of desire for shoes sounds like a practical choice, whereas the “female” version reflects enthusiasm for clothes and/or shopping.
The EliteSingles approach: If you’re a professional person trying to find love, your choice of app is crucial to the degree of success you experience; there are a lot of singles out there who may only end up wasting your valuable time. This is something we understand innately at EliteSingles, and it’s the reason that our core user base is primarily educated, professional singles between the ages of 30 – 55.
If you’re pulling your hair out trying to decide between a slew of apps with names like ‘Cherish’, ‘Tikkle’ and ‘LoveHouse’, fear not; EliteSingles has assembled a definitive who’s-who of well-known dating apps to help you make the right choice for your specific needs and tastes. We’ve examined several key competitors below, highlighting what works in each before comparing them with our own app, to show you why ours is one of the very best dating apps around today.
By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.
Appearances can be deceiving, though. Although Coffee Meets Bagel allows for a range of super-specific preferences, the bagel it sends you may or may not match your specified preferences and, more often than not, if they do, they will be a significant distance away. The app can also be glitchy, often resulting in slow update and load times, and sometimes it’s frustrating that it sends you only a single bagel a day. You can speed things up a bit by using the “give & take” option, but it’ll cost you 385 beans to like someone who catches your eye.
When Samantha Karjala started using apps to meet more people in her small Northeastern town, she was annoyed at what they implied. “When you say you went on a Tinder date, most people expect you had sex with the person,” she says. “It’s a bummer, because I used it to meet cool people to expand my dating pool, which was helpful with the radius feature on Tinder.” She says that, despite some annoying responses from dudes, she was just out of a relationship and wanted to stick with using the app. “I think I most enjoyed the bios, because it really shows what people think is important enough to say in a few words.” Her bio was a Nicki Minaj lyric that she says, “sparked a lot of conversations”—including one with the guy who would later become her husband.
Unlike eHarmony and some other dating sites, you are free to search anyone and anywhere. What makes it easy is the filtering process. You can narrow your results a lot on what you’re looking for. You can search by body type, whether they smoke or not, their age and location, what they’re looking for and so on. There’s also filters specifically for religious beliefs, which makes sense given who the audience is.
Hinge is kind of like Tinder. OK, it’s a lot like Tinder — but with a few key differences that make it better. Interface-wise, it looks like Tinder’s younger sister. But function-wise, it relies more on your Facebook friends to make connections for you. Hinge connects you through friends-of-friends-of-friends and shows you not just the people you have in common, but all the interests you have in common. It does this by having you answer a bunch of questions through a Tinder-like interface. Have you been to Berlin? Swipe right. Don’t play croquet? Swipe left. This makes answering questions far easier and less time-consuming, not to mention more fun. The questions themselves aren’t as asinine as those in some other dating apps, and give you a better sense of someone than 500 characters might.
Some of the qualitative research, such as Gibbs, Ellison, and Heino (2006) and Ellison, Heino, and Gibbs (2006), uses theories of gender and sexuality to inform hypotheses about gendered behaviour in online contexts. When users have virtually no limit on the amount of information they can provide in an ad, they can use other methods of signifying gender to supplement what is provided by basic demographic details and also by the inclusion of a photograph. Use of a photo is still highly strategic because of its status as “proof” of claims made in the profile about physical appearance; photos are important because proof of the body is important (Whitty & Carr, 2006). Images are also used to signify aspects of identity (Whitty, 2007a).