The tone is simultaneously demanding and self-congratulatory, such that one almost wonders if the writer is being ironic. He implies that while he desires a certain level of independence and intelligence, “too much” makes a woman “a bitch,” though very good looks (“being considered a knockout”) are acceptable—particularly if she doesn’t have too high an opinion of herself.
I approach these questions through a discourse analysis of 20 dating profiles taken from a popular website, Nerve.com. I use gender theory and discourse analysis to show how identity is being constructed and projected as gendered in various ways by these individuals, looking to earlier studies of print and online dating advertisements, in particular Jagger (1998) and Coupland (1996), as a starting point for my analysis. I argue that due to long-term shifts in the way we signal our identities or identifications, and to changes in the format of the advertisements (from print to Internet “profiles”), gender identity is “indexed” primarily through references to other, lifestyle-affiliated categories as well as through more direct discursive cues. Examples discussed in my analysis include descriptions of one’s self and of one’s desired partner; signification of lifestyle through references to activities and practices, consumer items (such as food, technology), and culture (books, music, films); and implicating the state of one’s body through references to physical activity and appearance.
When you’re ready to sign up for LatinAmericanCupid, the process is straightforward. The good news is that the Cupid family of sites is adept at getting quality profiles out of its users. This means you’ll spend a little more time than usual signing up, but the results of your profile will be better—and that means better odds of finding the right one for you.
Hinge makes itself unique by providing prompts to answer instead of making you sweat through the bio-writing process: from, “The key to my heart is…” to, “Where to find me at a party?” and, “I’ll pick the first part of the date, you pick the second.” Additionally, Hinge opts out of the swipe-based premise by allowing users to like or comment on individual profile photos and prompt answers. From there, the liked user has the option to start the conversation.
You can only add photos of yourself from Facebook or Instagram, though, which is kind of limiting if you’re not very active on either. Also, while the friends-of-friends concept has a lot of benefits, it’s also restricting. It’s possible to run out of matches after 10 minutes of browsing, which is a letdown if you’re actually enjoying the app or are serious about finding a date.
Nerve.com is a site based in the United States, with geographic search features and an international site readership. Founded in 1997, Nerve is not solely a dating site, but more of a content hub in the form of “a website and eMag dedicated to sex, relationships, and culture” (Empson, 2012). Because Nerve had an emphasis on content with the dating section as a subsection, it was (and is still) more likely to be attracting users who are part of the young, progressive, “hip” audience that the site seems to target for its blogs and advice columns. Although there were many other dating sites available, one reason I chose Nerve as the source for my sample was its target audience, members of which seemed likely to be more Internet-savvy than average. Another reason was that at the time these examples were collected in 2007, Nerve’s profile format allowed a degree of expressive freedom that was uncommon. The amount of free-form text that users were prompted to supply provided enough material for a substantive analysis.
The EliteSingles approach: If you’re a professional person trying to find love, your choice of app is crucial to the degree of success you experience; there are a lot of singles out there who may only end up wasting your valuable time. This is something we understand innately at EliteSingles, and it’s the reason that our core user base is primarily educated, professional singles between the ages of 30 – 55.
Although the user base isn’t as large as that of Match.com or eHarmony, it is growing – and unlike eHarmony, Chemistry.com also allows same-sex matching. Free users can take the personality test, see photos, and get matches; however, you must subscribe to contact other members. The cost to join is $39.99 for one month, $26.99 per month for a three-month subscription, and $20.99 per month for a six-month subscription.